Often times, the lines of aesthetic reception and mass, popular culture flow together in a stream of interrelation. In other words, what is found artistically favorable is rooted in the perception of the given culture in a specific space and time. The state of technology, itself an aesthetic form, can become an erotic personal intermingling of beauty and the sexuality of the body that is reflected in our own sense of cultural perception; technology has become this culture’s art form. Specifically, in our complete concentration on the media, we exemplify the artistic critic, as we would study the contours of a sculpture or the specific color usage in a painting. This sense of aesthetic is tellingly specific to culture, for the technology has become a materialized canvas. Its form is everywhere one looks, it is inescapable. Thus, just as there is a certain quality, a beauty in other art forms, the same can be found in technology. We are subjugated by its assault daily. In the union of body, computer, television, and Ipod, and an almost art-like intimacy found in social networking we exemplify the quality of technological aesthetic; there is a co-habitation of aesthetic reception with mass culture. There is a direct correlation between how society view things, in this case art, and how society functions as a whole. There is a symbiosis between the two, between mass culture in general, and the ways in which art is perceived. Each directly affects the other. Great innovations transform the entire technique of the arts, thereby affecting artistic invention itself and perhaps even bringing about an amazing change in our very notion of art. All of the old catalysts for art— genius, creativity, mystery and eternal value— have all become outmoded in a society of reproduction and mass consumption; where once only food, water and electricity were the bare necessities, so have audio and visual images permeated not simply into society, but into our very homes. Clearly the link between the reception of art and mass culture becomes even stronger, when art becomes readily available at any given time or place. With reproduction, aura and tradition are completely removed from the work of art that brings about both contemporary crisis and renewal of mankind itself; the perception of art is directly related upon the culture that views it. In the case of modern mass culture, the void where ritual once stood in relation to art has been replaced by politics. Rather than relegating art to the realm of ‘cult object’, it has become a tool for the manipulation of thoughts, beliefs and behavior of society. Just as the words became easily reproducible, turning the reader into the writer, at least in the case of “Letters to the Editor” so does the reproductability of art turn the observers into the arts. Reproduction of art has changed the reactions of masses to it from reactionary to progressive, and in doing so, brought about a change in the very notion of art itself….